16Sep

Stop, Question and Frisk Is Not The Enemy – Crime Is

By , September 16th, 2012 | Editorial, New York, Police | 8 Comments

New York City Police Department has come under fire in the past years in the courts and the public realm for its “Stop, Question and Frisk” (SQF) crime-fighting tactic.  Often bastardized by its critics as “stop-and-frisk,” many like the New York Civil Liberties Union charge that it unfairly targets minorities while groups like the Center for Constitutional Rights have blatantly called it racial profiling.  This effective and legal tool that helped lower New York City’s crime rate should not be cast aside.

For the sake of full disclosure, I am a gay Caucasian police officer married to a naturalized Hispanic U.S. citizen.

SQF, otherwise known as the Terry Stop, gets its origin from the 1968 U.S. Supreme Court Terry vs. Ohio case.  The U.S. Department of Homeland Security describes the purpose of SQF “is to conduct a brief investigation to confirm or deny that the suspect is involved in criminal activity. A law enforcement officer may initiate a Terry stop when he or she suspects that an individual is committing, has committed, or is about to commit a crime, but probable cause does not yet exist to arrest and the officer wants to ‘stop’ the suspect and investigate. If, during the stop, probable cause to arrest is developed, the suspect will be arrested. If probable cause is not developed, the suspect is released.”

A comparison of the crime rate of New York with Chicago, a city whose police force the New York Post reports “stops but usually don’t frisk them in search of weapons, though they’re authorized to do so,” demonstrates the effectiveness of SQF.  In direct comparison, the NY Post informs that Chicago had 275 murders in the first half of 2012, 22 percent more than New York for the same period, a city three times the size of Chicago.

As for the yearly totals of the federally tracked seven major felony offenses, Chicago PD reports indicate that their crime was higher in 2000 – 2008 than what NYPD reported levels.  While Chicago’s crime rate did dip below New York’s in 2009 -2011, if population level correction was factored in, Chicago’s crime rate supersedes New York.

New York Times informs that Philadelphia Police Department (PPD) also utilized an aggressive and effective SQF policy up through 2010 until it decided to settle a class-action lawsuit brought against the PPD by American Civil Liberties Union of Pennsylvania and the law firm of Kairys, Rudovsky, Messing & Feinberg.  Their claim alleged “that thousands of people each year are stopped, frisked, searched, and detained solely on the basis of their race or ethnicity by the Philadelphia Police Department as part of its stop-and-frisk policy.”

Since that settlement, crime has increased.  PPD reports that as homicide victims decreased from the beginning of the policies use in 2007 to 2009, they started to rise again stating in 2010, both year-end and year-to-date as of Sept. 15, 2012.

Homicide Victims 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007
Year-End Totals 324 306 302 331 391
Homicide Victims 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007
Year-To-Date Sept 15, 2012 253 231 219 210 234 296

PPD Police Commissioner Charles. H Ramsey told the New York Times that in most of the 2012 homicide case, both the victims and the killers were black or Hispanic.  So when PPD police officers are searching for those the majority of those killers, most suspects that are SQF are going to be black or Hispanic.

Even San Francisco, the last bastion of civil liberties, is considering implementation of SQF to battle violent crime. The San Francisco Chronicle said that San Francisco Mayor Ed Lee is interested in utilizing SQF to keep up the San Francisco Police Department’s good work and ensuring that violent crime does not start rising again.

The problem many have is looking past numbers and percentages when it comes to race and applying common sense.  SQF is affected more often in high crime areas and with suspects that fit the profiles of those wanted by the police. If PPD’s homicide detectives were stopping an equal amount of whites, blacks, Hispanics and Asians, they would be wasting precious time and resources. Rolling back SQF means letting crime roll back in and that is unacceptable.

Feature photo credit: bobsfever via photopin cc

  • I must thank you for the efforts you’ve put in writing this site. I am hoping to check out the same high-grade blog posts by you later on as well. In truth, your creative writing abilities has inspired me to get my own website now 😉

  • Hello there! This is my 1st comment here so I just
    wanted to give a quick shout out and say I really enjoy reading through
    your posts. Can you suggest any other blogs/websites/forums
    that go over the same subjects? Thank you!

  • I believe what you composed was very reasonable. But, think about this, what if you
    added a little information? I am not saying your content is not solid, however suppose you added a
    headline that grabbed a person’s attention? I mean NYPD’s Stop-and-Frisk policy | Wolf In Pig’s Clothing is kinda vanilla. You could look at Yahoo’s home
    page and note how they create news headlines
    to grab viewers to open the links. You might try adding a video or a picture or two to get people excited about everything’ve got to say. In my opinion, it would make your website a little bit more interesting.

  • Woah! I’m really enjoying the template/theme of this website. It’s simple, yet effective.
    A lot of times it’s tough to get that “perfect balance” between superb usability and appearance. I must say that you’ve done a great
    job with this. Additionally, the blog loads very quick
    for me on Firefox. Superb Blog!

  • Hello just wanted to give you a brief heads up and let you know a few of the images aren’t loading correctly. I’m not
    sure why but I think its a linking issue. I’ve tried it in two different browsers and both show the same outcome.

  • I really like what you guys are up too. This sort of clever
    work and reporting! Keep up the terrific works guys I’ve added you guys to blogroll.

  • work at home

    I blog often and I seriously thank you for your content.
    This article has really peaked my interest. I will book mark
    your site and keep checking for new information about once a week.
    I subscribed to your Feed as well.

  • Thanks to my father who stated to me on the topic of this weblog, this weblog is actually amazing.

Back to top

Copyright Notice and Disclaimer:

This site may also contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in order to further our educational objectives. We believe this constitutes a “fair use” of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information, go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond “fair use,” you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
%d bloggers like this: